Next:

Dotted Pair Notation .................... "Dotted pair notation" is an alternative syntax for cons cells that represents the CAR and CDR explicitly. In this syntax, `(A . B)' stands for a cons cell whose CAR is the object A, and whose CDR is the object B. Dotted pair notation is therefore more general than list syntax. In the dotted pair notation, the list `(1 2 3)' is written as `(1 . (2 . (3 . nil)))'. For `nil'-terminated lists, the two notations produce the same result, but list notation is usually clearer and more convenient when it is applicable. When printing a list, the dotted pair notation is only used if the CDR of a cell is not a list. Box notation can also be used to illustrate what dotted pairs look like. For example, `(rose . violet)' is diagrammed as follows: ___ ___ |___|___|--> violet | | --> rose Dotted pair notation can be combined with list notation to represent a chain of cons cells with a non-`nil' final CDR. For example, `(rose violet . buttercup)' is equivalent to `(rose . (violet . buttercup))'. The object looks like this: ___ ___ ___ ___ |___|___|--> |___|___|--> buttercup | | | | --> rose --> violet These diagrams make it evident that `(rose . violet . buttercup)' must have an invalid syntax since it would require that a cons cell have three parts rather than two. The list `(rose violet)' is equivalent to `(rose . (violet))' and looks like this: ___ ___ ___ ___ |___|___|--> |___|___|--> nil | | | | --> rose --> violet Similarly, the three-element list `(rose violet buttercup)' is equivalent to `(rose . (violet . (buttercup)))'. It looks like this: ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ |___|___|--> |___|___|--> |___|___|--> nil | | | | | | --> rose --> violet --> buttercup